Transparency vs commission politics
Rogan argues referees should speak openly to improve accountability and education. McCarthy explains commissions fear added scrutiny and controversy when officials comment publicly.
Joe sits down with Josh Thompson, a retired champion mixed martial artist and fight analyst, and Big John McCarthy, a veteran mixed martial arts referee, Professional Fighters League commentator, and founder of Big John McCarthy’s C.O.M.M.A.N.D., an internationally recognized training school for referees and judges in mixed martial arts. Josh and John host the “Weighing In” podcast.www.youtube.com/@WeighingInhttps://linktr.ee/weighinginpodcastwww.mmareferee.com Perplexity: Download the app or ask Perplexity anything at https://pplx.ai/rogan. 50% off your first box at https://thefarmersdog.com/rogan! Use code ROGAN at https://BlueChew.com to get 10% OFF + Free Overnight Shipping on your first order. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Rogan argues referees should speak openly to improve accountability and education. McCarthy explains commissions fear added scrutiny and controversy when officials comment publicly.
They criticize how rule differences like 12–6 elbows vary by jurisdiction, citing New Jersey as an example. They argue it creates unsafe confusion for fighters and referees mid-career.
They debate why some strikes are restricted while others remain legal, comparing knee damage to knockouts. They argue selective bans often lack consistency with actual harm in fights.
McCarthy supports grounded knees in some contexts but opposes stomps as rarely effective unless an opponent is already hurt. They contrast how rings and cages change the danger profile.
They reminisce about Pride’s style and how Shogun Rua’s performance versus Rampage redefined him for many fans. They also talk about the hyper-aggressive Curitiba camp reputation.
They contrast Alexander’s chaotic persona with Fedor’s stoic demeanor, using tattoos and body language as examples. They also note the Soviet-style relaxed-then-explode boxing rhythm.
McCarthy shares training with Fedor and emphasizes his explosiveness, deceptive posture, and endurance. They highlight his transitions between striking, throws, and fast submissions like armbars.
They explain how Fedor pressured Cro Cop backward, reduced kicking space, and leveraged grappling threat to neutralize the left kick. They note it required unique skills and confidence to execute.
They call Cro Cop’s left kick the best in MMA history and discuss why his explosive style transferred to MMA better than some rhythm-based kickboxers. They compare other standout kickers like Barboza.
They argue Jose Aldo’s takedown defense remains underappreciated, referencing fights with relentless wrestlers. They connect Aldo’s footwork and conditioning to soccer-like stop-and-go demands.
They call extreme weight cuts dangerous and irrational compared to other sports’ nutrition focus. They explore proposals like random weigh-ins and strict walk-around limits to reduce abuse.
They discuss how severe dehydration can reduce durability even if size advantages look intimidating. Examples include Pereira at 185 and the tradeoff between strength and speed.
They recall how gaunt McGregor looked at 145 yet still fought fast and sharp, highlighting youth as a factor. They argue that approach becomes unsustainable with age.
They debate Holloway moving up to 155, then cutting back to 145 for a title shot, and how that may have contributed to his first knockout. They compare it to Roy Jones Jr’s post-heavyweight drop-off.
They cite cases of fighters gaining 20+ pounds after weigh-ins, including a reported 27-pound rebound on a recent California card. They frame it as evidence that the system incentivizes dangerous extremes.
They use Rumble as the cautionary archetype of drastic cuts that repeatedly strain the body. McCarthy describes the long-term kidney and health risks from repeated cycles.
They credit Andrei Arlovski for adapting from power punching to a safer volume style to extend his career. They highlight specific wins and how reduced risk preserved him over time.
They explain why some stoppages happen due to cuts near sensitive structures like the tear duct, not just visible bleeding. They emphasize that the reason can be misunderstood by viewers.
They argue scoring and officiating decisions were questionable and believe Rico was winning. They also criticize the stoppage sequence and how time lost on a mouthpiece can distort fairness.
McCarthy says current practice should be to reinsert the mouthpiece quickly rather than walking it to a corner to rinse. He frames the older approach as outdated and competitively unfair.
They argue metal cups should be illegal because they can injure opponents and create unfair leverage in positions like armbars. They cite examples and how equipment can affect submissions.
They recount the moment Mir broke Tim Sylvia’s forearm and Herb stopped it despite crowd boos. McCarthy describes how officials confirmed the break and why letting it continue would be dangerous.
They criticize commentators and fans who want fighters to continue with serious injuries. They argue the sport is not worth irreversible harm and that officials must intervene.
McCarthy explains how judging sightlines and limited angles can produce disagreements without corruption. He argues five judges does not fix fundamentals if judge quality is inconsistent.
They discuss how a single outlier judge can swing bets and create incentives for corruption. They reference investigations and note the UFC has faced scrutiny over betting anomalies.
They emphasize officiating is harder than most fans think and requires constant education. McCarthy describes building courses and the need for elite officials on major fights.
Rogan argues win bonuses can unfairly cut pay in bad decisions and that fighters should be paid to compete. They debate alternatives like higher show money and separate finish incentives.
They praise fighters who live frugally and criticize reckless spending on cars and luxuries. They argue careers are short and comfort can dull competitive urgency.
They discuss how riding motorcycles is a high-probability injury risk, especially for fighters. They cite examples and the saying that all riders eventually go down.
They compare modern button-pushers to the Chael and McGregor model and discuss how controversy creates opportunities. They also note risks when hype exceeds skill or discipline.
They discuss how a shallow heavyweight roster can fast-track top wrestlers into title contention. They note raw prospects still need time to learn striking defense and pacing.
They question the 265-pound cap and argue bigger athletes should be allowed with proper structure. They propose creating a separate class above 225 to accommodate true giants.
They discuss the “enhanced games” concept and how it functions as marketing for hormone programs. They debate the added ethical stakes when performance enhancement increases damage in fighting.
They reference APOE4 as a modifier that may increase CTE severity after repetitive head impacts. They stress outcomes vary widely among athletes even with similar exposure.
They argue fighters often return too quickly after concussions and need longer rest periods. They cite examples from boxing where extended layoffs helped restore durability.
They discuss Eddie Futch urging Roach to retire and how continued fighting worsened long-term issues. They also mention Roach’s later success as a trainer informed by that experience.
They discuss claims that signs of brain trauma appear in many levels of contact sports, including younger athletes. They frame it as a broad public health issue, not only an NFL problem.
McCarthy describes how MMA removes the decision time boxing provides because follow-up strikes arrive instantly. He gives examples of fighters appearing out but then moving or recovering unexpectedly.
They explain how wrestling danger disrupts a striker’s rhythm and opens shots that would not land in pure kickboxing. They cite classic examples like Randleman vs Cro Cop and Khabib vs McGregor.
They argue Islam is more dangerous on the feet than he is credited for and cite head-kick finishes. They emphasize that opponents focusing on grappling can be caught by his stand-up.
They praise Topuria’s streak while noting circumstances like opponents coming off knockouts or major weight cuts. They argue Charles Oliveira’s loss is the cleanest data point among them.
They criticize taking a high-risk rematch soon after a knockout and argue trusted people should protect fighters from themselves. They connect camp intensity and travel to inadequate brain recovery.
They praise fighters who leave on their own terms and discuss how identity shifts after competition. Examples include Khabib and Dustin choosing family and life stability.
They highlight Khabib’s consistency, humility, and year-round training habits as the foundation of his dominance. They discuss how fame disrupts many champions, but not him.
They contrast the team’s constant training and avoidance of nightlife with other fighters’ drinking and recovery issues. They argue alcohol and partying quietly degrade performance and durability.
They discuss how elite Muay Thai and kickboxing experience creates timing and positional mastery that MMA generalists struggle to match. They cite fighters like Pereira and other striking specialists as examples.
They debate how different contenders match up against Islam and each other, emphasizing style clashes. They also spotlight less-known elite talent from outside the UFC who could shake up divisions.
They describe Pico’s early losses as over-aggression and pressure to prove himself. They praise later performances for calmer pacing and smarter transitions that better showcase his skill.
They analyze the headbutt foul, point deduction, and restart positioning in Schilling’s fight. McCarthy argues the referee was trying to restore the position properly, but Schilling got emotional and chose to stop.
McCarthy explains he wrote BKFC rules and argues commissions overreact to bare fists despite allowing shins, knees, and elbows in MMA. He frames bare-knuckle as a viable niche where certain fighters can thrive.
They argue constant scheduling makes it harder to build stars and reach casual fans, even when fight-night cards deliver great action. They note brand trust keeps casual viewers tuning in despite unfamiliar names.
They debate the idea of hosting a major card outdoors, highlighting heat, bugs, lighting, and dehydration as competitive variables. They argue championship fights should happen in controlled indoor environments.
Rogan describes pushing for ibogaine access as a treatment option for PTSD and traumatic brain injury, emphasizing veteran need and bipartisan appeal. They frame it as a rare issue where political barriers were overcome quickly.
They discuss visible deterioration in parts of California and argue current approaches enable addiction and instability. They criticize incentives and spending accountability, and argue treatment and enforcement should be prioritized.
They debate tax thresholds, capital gains incentives, and the idea of untaxed lower incomes to stimulate spending. They also claim large-scale fraud and waste drive distrust more than tax rates themselves.
They discuss why veterans like Poirier and Gaethje remain hard to beat and argue skill, mindset, and experience keep them dangerous. They frame many young contenders as talented but not yet complete at elite level.