Ari’s long travel disappearances
Ari describes going off-grid for six to seven months and how it differs from earlier trips when he stayed in closer contact. They joke about people not knowing where he was and how he still did some remote podcasts.
Ari Shaffir is a comedian, writer, and host of “You Be Trippin’.” His seven-episode live storytelling series, “The End,” is available now from YMH Studios.https://theend.ymhstudios.comwww.youtube.com/@youbetrippinpodwww.youtube.com/@arishaffirwww.arishaffir.com Perplexity: Download the app or ask Perplexity anything at https://pplx.ai/rogan. Get a free welcome kit with your first subscription of AG1 at drinkag1.com/joerogan Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Ari describes going off-grid for six to seven months and how it differs from earlier trips when he stayed in closer contact. They joke about people not knowing where he was and how he still did some remote podcasts.
They talk about starting a watch-along breakdown podcast during the pandemic after abandoning a Sex and the City idea. It becomes a riff on how comedians fill time when touring shuts down.
Joe recalls early “X dose” edibles and how inconsistent labeling made dosing unpredictable. He describes a terrifyingly strong edible ride on BART where reality felt flat and unreal.
Joe tells a story about taking strong THC pills at a jiu-jitsu event and sensing something dark in a guy’s demeanor. Later he learned the man was wanted for rape, reinforcing the idea that drugs can amplify intuition but also distort it.
Ari describes leaving a festival and feeling like he could identify who was on mushrooms, acid, weed, alcohol, or MDMA just by looking. They discuss how altered states change social perception and pattern recognition.
They discuss ibogaine, MDMA, and psilocybin as non-recreational tools for addiction and PTSD treatment, especially for veterans. They frame political hesitation as fear of being labeled pro-drug despite mounting clinical evidence.
Joe praises Texas leaders for allocating major funding after being convinced ibogaine is therapeutic rather than recreational. They use it as an example of officials changing views when confronted with detailed information.
They argue high-THC products are not for everyone, especially those predisposed to psychosis. They praise lower-potency “old school” weed as closer to a manageable, social high than modern concentrates.
Ari recounts an Ecuadorian town choosing to brand itself around ayahuasca despite fears of attracting addicts. Local leaders changed their minds after experiencing ceremonies and seeing it as infrequent, intentional use.
They trace stigma and legal barriers to Nixon-era policy and how it shaped cultural assumptions for decades. The conversation emphasizes how hard it is to revisit entrenched narratives once they become default beliefs.
They debate advocacy groups pushing “MDMA” to avoid party-drug connotations. Ari argues common names reflect real-world use and that rebranding cannot erase recreational culture.
They joke about mushroom foraging in places like Edinburgh and the absurdity of when something becomes illegal. The discussion highlights how laws often hinge on technicalities rather than harm.
Joe describes riding rescue elephants in Thailand and later feeling conflicted about it. They contrast “humane” experiences with broader concerns about exploitation and shifting travel ethics.
They argue public outrage and constant commentary can raise the stakes and complicate hostage-style negotiations. The discussion frames media attention as both inevitable and sometimes counterproductive.
They discuss how networks and influencers profit from nonstop attention and how outrage coverage can amplify the target. They describe a cycle where attention becomes currency regardless of stated intentions.
They explore a claim that large defense spending depends on maintaining a credible external threat. The conversation also questions whether some foreign policy outcomes are accidents or predictable incentives.
They criticize leaving behind military hardware and question why more wasn’t destroyed or removed. They frame it as either incompetence at scale or a choice with downstream consequences.
They compare cartels and extremist groups to powerful domestic industries that profit despite public damage. The conversation cites large overdose death tolls and focuses on incentives and lobbying power.
They discuss dramatizations of OxyContin’s rollout and how emotional storytelling makes the harm feel real. They focus on expanding prescribing thresholds and misleading claims about addiction risk.
Joe describes being offered multiple opiates after minor procedures and feeling the system is over-prescriptive. They criticize weak warnings and perverse incentives that encourage filling prescriptions.
They talk about how common painkillers can be deadly when misused, especially acetaminophen. The discussion frames some deaths as tragic and preventable through better public understanding.
They recount the cyanide-laced Tylenol case and how it changed packaging norms. They also discuss copycats and whether companies minimized risk versus issuing broader recalls.
They revisit the story of rear-end fire risk and the idea that corporations weigh payouts against redesign costs. The conversation uses it as a shorthand for institutional cruelty driven by profit.
They discuss claims that major companies supported intimidation or violence to suppress labor movements in places like Colombia and Guatemala. It is framed as an extension of protecting margins at extreme human cost.
They talk about trade policy enabling moving factories to cheaper labor markets and weakening unions. They cite Detroit and Flint as symbols of long-term social damage from corporate relocation.
They note Detroit’s partial recovery with new businesses and culture. The conversation shifts into food, praising Detroit-style pizza and joking about why people prefer pizza shapes and slice conventions.
They argue Portnoy’s pizza reviews drive real consumer behavior and act as a national recommendation engine. They describe his blunt style, conflicts with shop owners, and how viewers use him for local picks.
They swap stories about eating past comfort, especially in New York, and feeling mentally dulled afterward. Ari connects compulsive ordering to childhood scarcity and a desire for abundance.
They reminisce about early UFC events when fewer people watched and friends could joke on camera. Ari recalls making out with Duncan during a broadcast as a bored-comic stunt.
They criticize modern weight cutting as rewarding dehydration strategy over skill and argue it distorts matchups. They propose random checks and structural reforms to force athletes to compete closer to true weight.
They note weight cuts can be harsher for women due to physiology and water retention. The point is used to argue the current system is both unsafe and unevenly punishing.
They compare boxing’s many divisions to UFC’s fewer, highlighting gaps like 185 to 205. They also discuss how some divisions draw less attention regardless of talent and how size bias shapes fandom.
They note bare-knuckle boxing’s comeback and joke about chess boxing as an inherently flawed combo. The conversation centers on how spectacle evolves and cycles back to older formats.
They discuss chess ratings as a handicap-like system and cite Magnus Carlsen’s historically high peak. They also touch on Bobby Fischer’s legacy and how dominance is contextualized by era and competition.
They describe elite pool performances where players run racks without missing and explain Fargo ratings. The discussion highlights how rare sustained perfection is under tight-pocket conditions.
They discuss Asian popularity of cue sports and new formats in China offering large prize pools. They connect it to athletes relocating for money, similar to women’s basketball players going abroad.
They cite huge TV audiences for snooker in China and compare it to major U.S. sports events. The conversation contrasts snooker’s table size, ball set, and strategic pace with pool.
They explain the basics of three-cushion billiards and why it improves understanding of speed, rails, and English. The appeal is framed as skill-building even if it lacks the satisfaction of pocketing balls.
They describe loud, crowded pool rooms where movement and yelling are constant and big money is on the line. Pros can underperform because the environment disrupts focus, leading some to use noise-canceling earbuds.
Ari talks about grinding poker and cites Mike Caro’s classic book on tells. He shares a hand where he deliberately looked at chips to fake strength and got a fold by reverse-engineering the tell.
They note the book includes crude, era-specific stereotypes about how different groups play. The segment becomes a broader riff on how “observations” age and what gets labeled unacceptable over time.
They argue about shifting language norms and how broad labels like “Asian” cover vast regions and cultures. The conversation is mostly about category boundaries and how definitions become politicized.
They discuss heavily fortified borders and describe reports of Israel bombing southern Lebanon and targeting journalists. The segment focuses on fear of widening conflict and the human cost of escalation.
They recall months of mass protests against Netanyahu’s proposed judicial changes before the war. The point is used to argue Israel is politically divided and not a monolithic hive mind.
They describe Gaza as flattened and criticize justifying civilian suffering by collective blame. They argue moral empathy should not depend on identity or faction and compare it to hypothetical retaliation scenarios.
They discuss the controversy over secondhand claims about planned regime-change targets. The argument hinges on whether the subsequent sequence of conflicts makes the claim relevant even if the memo wasn’t personally read.
They acknowledge climate has always shifted while also arguing humans worsen it through pollution. They criticize profiteering, performative recycling, and using climate as a tool for control rather than effective solutions.
They discuss sites like Machu Picchu, Baalbek, Petra, and Nazca lines as evidence of advanced ancient engineering. They emphasize unknown builders, earthquake-resistant stonework, and the puzzle of moving massive blocks.
They recount stories like Derinkuyu in Turkey being found via a small opening and China’s Longyou Caves discovered after draining ponds. The theme is how huge human-made spaces can exist with unclear provenance and sparse records.
Ari says guides complain influencers disrupt trips by demanding shots and special treatment. They cite a case of a streamer punished abroad and argue more consequences might curb antisocial behavior.
They compare how different places tolerate loud public audio and constant chatter. The discussion frames it as cultural baseline differences and how cities normalize chronic sensory overload.
They discuss research suggesting birdsong can reduce anxiety and traffic noise can worsen mood. The broader point is that the nervous system still treats ambient sound patterns as safety signals.
They argue parks materially improve city life and criticize attempts to replace small community gardens with development when alternatives exist. Central Park is treated as an untouchable mental-health asset that would be impossible to build today.
They discuss barefoot grounding claims and the noticeable mental shift when offline in remote nature. Ari frames his months without social media as restoring attention, creativity, and a sense of self.
Ari explains banking evergreen episodes, batching ad reads, and minimizing tech overhead by using a phone and a tripod. He describes building a workflow that avoids constant scheduling pressure.
They describe network pressure around specials and how Ari’s show was canceled after refusing certain deals. They frame it as executive power plays that backfired as the internet made gatekeepers less relevant.
Ari describes producing a new series with YMH support, flying in many comics, and aiming for TV-level quality without network constraints. He frames it as finishing unfinished business and ending the project on his own terms.
Ari says in many countries people react with genuine awe to the idea of making a living as a stand-up comic. They frame it as a rare job title that reliably sparks joy and curiosity from strangers.
They discuss pressure to chase short-form crowdwork clips and compare different paths to building an audience. The advice is to focus on what you do well, accept a longer road, and avoid letting platforms dictate craft.